Category
4 articles
Manchester 2013 left a layer of accepted abstracts and session proposals that never became full papers. This archival audit asks what those unfinished projects reveal about anthropological preoccupations between 2013 and 2026, and proposes a compact reading pack for UK departments interested in research continuity and open scholarship.
The printed programme for Manchester 2013 records what was meant to happen, not what did. This analysis argues that a responsible archive must log cancelled panels, withdrawn abstracts and undelivered papers with the same care as the sessions that went ahead — and sets out principles for scholars using the record in 2026 without mistaking it for a complete account of the dialogue.
The 2013 closing plenary is often remembered as a moment of consensus about interdisciplinary anthropology. Revisiting programme notes and delegate reflections in the archive suggests a more uneven picture, one that still speaks directly to UK departments in 2026. The article argues for reviving a short public conference minute that records disagreement as well as agreement.
A close reading of selected panels and deposited papers from the IUAES 2013 conference shows that several of 2026's most pressing UK anthropological debates were already in view. The archive is less a time capsule than a working set of questions about method, accountability and the public role of the discipline.